The second characteristic involves the theatrical quality of their benevolence. For a fake person, every good deed is essentially a rehearsed performance designed to make them shine. They don’t just want to do good; they want to be seen doing good. This is the individual who ensures their acts of charity are documented on social media or mentioned casually but frequently in conversation. Their decisions are always framed as the “right” or “noble” choice, not because they care about the outcome, but because they care about how the decision reflects on their character.
This type of behavior turns human connection into a spectacle. The results of every request they fulfill are packaged for maximum impact, and every act of kindness is measured by its “communication value.” Genuine kindness, however, often thrives in secrecy. It is lived out in the quiet moments where no one is watching and no applause is expected. When you encounter exaggerated smiles and a constant need to narrate one’s own virtues, it is a sign that you are witnessing artifice. Protecting yourself from the disappointment of these shallow relationships requires looking past the “performance” and seeking out those who act from a place of quiet conviction rather than a desire for a standing ovation.
The third pillar of superficiality is the use of kindness as a strategic disguise. Initially, these individuals may come across as excessively attentive, cautious, and even perfectionistic. They are masters of the first impression, projecting a curated image that aligns with what they believe others want to see. This is particularly prevalent in the digital age, where social media profiles are polished to a mirror sheen. These people control their public image with the precision of a professional influencer, ensuring that every word and gesture reinforces their “best self.”
However, over time, the mask inevitably begins to slip. Because their kindness is a calculation rather than an instinct, it is difficult for them to maintain the facade in private or under stress. They struggle with deep, vulnerable connections because true intimacy requires a level of honesty that would threaten their carefully constructed image. If you notice a persistent lack of naturalness—a sense that every conversation is a negotiation and every smile is a tactical move—you are likely dealing with someone who prioritizes appearance over authenticity. Honest communication is often messy and imperfect, whereas the fake person’s communication is always “on brand.” Recognizing this distinction is key to preserving your peace of mind.
SEE CONTINUES ON THE NEXT PAGE
